Professors at Carnegie Preach Incapability.

 In the online student newspaper of Carnegie college, The Tartan, a revealing article quotes the schools professors in a light few will appreciate:

Faculty Hosts Forum on Barack Obama’s Campaign  http://www.thetartan.org/2008/4/21/news/obama

““What impressed me with Obama is how he’s been able to mobilize young people,” said associate art professor Ayanah Moor.”

“Associate history professor John Soluri commented on the significance of the Senator’s success so far. “Everyone loves a winner,” he said. “It will be hard to overturn his current lead of delegates.””

“Continuing on the topic of funding, philosophy department faculty member Andy Norman said that what impressed him about Obama was “his refusing to take money from lobbyists.””

“Lisa Hazirjian, an adjunct history professor and the forum’s stand-in moderator mentioned that she didn’t believe Obama’s recent comments regarding “bitter” rural Pennsylvanians would do much damage to his campaign.”

“If Barack Obama becomes president, how other countries view the United States changes overnight,” Shields said. “Imagine if a kid in Africa were to wake up one day and see the ruler of the free world as a black man.”

When professors of our colleges reduce themselves to;

* favorably comment on the deceptive influence of the meaningless and most overused platitudes in history of a current candidate daring to use such as “change” on the most susceptible and unaware of us…

* Casually remark on the sheer stupidity of ‘following the herd mentality’ is anywhere near acceptable instead of encouraging support based solely on honest capability…

* Make an already proven false claim that a candidate refuses lobbyist funds when the evidence reveals over 2 million dollars collects interest for him due directly to lobbyist contributions AND where lobbyists are members of his own staff.

* Attempt to mitigate Obama’s rightful cost of an election to blatant elitism…

* Mindnumbingly offer that a message of socialism is anywhere near correct for a country founded upon freedom and self accountability OR have the audacity to continue on to drool in the outrageously racist implication that the pigment of a United States president’s skin dictates whether that president is racist or not when we’ve seen this predominately middle eastern/caucasion candidate who was taught for twenty years to BE a racist…

THEN, we know our children’s instruction is in the hands of the insanely incompetent which means change is certainly in our near future but, not the socialist kind they have in mind.

Prepare yourself professors for the change of who is signing your paychecks!